A Careful Critical Analysis

Don't be a Absurd, it's only a Word!
Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, yes, yes.
But!
The whiffle isn’t lifting up the waffle it’s recalling
And the simple trumbling creshner needs a little overhauling,
Yes, we all agree the brister-basters meet the speculation,
But the tonal inferentials aren’t exactly regulation.
And what about the effrel, don’t you think we need a spare?

You know best of course, you’re our resource, but are you not aware
That Travex’s latest seller on a similar enchantment
has enough gigantic juggles to engorge a large decampment!
Now wait a gosh darn minute, we aren’t selling jiggle juggle, we are shuffling up the Forty-four to sixty demiguggle!
And,
I have a small suggestion re: the tonalized regression, It’s succession, not regression.
(Any Orthopod could recognize a chordal form progression!)

So if you want your money, you will need to quittle snick.
Now don’t get so excited, it’s a simple squattle trick.
It shouldn’t take an hour, it will fittle like a stick,
What? It’s actually a fattle? Not a fittle? Can’t you fittle anyway?
Ok!
Calm Down! It was a stimple sip mistake.
So it’s a fattle not a fittle; what difference does it make?

What? They need it now?
Can you do it right away?
Oh I see. Without a fittle?
Not a squattle? Not a quittle? Not a chordalized succession?
Nor an effrel, nor a jiggle, nor a chordal form progression?

Can you get it done by five o’clock?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tulip Hunting In Central Park